I wholeheartedly agree, in my opinion as an lawyer who has appeared before her several occasions, that if we do not be part of our voices and vote to have her legally removed from the bench, then we’re complicit in this judicial atrocity. The Brooklyn Democratic Party is coming beneath fireplace for backing the re-election of a choose who’s been slammed by law enforcement for letting dangerous defendants again on the road without bail. Baily-Schiffman was elected to the civil court in 1999 and re-elected in 2009 to a term ending in 2018.
Overtly aggressive and hostile to the protection and decidedly calm, solicitous and biased in favor of and to plaintiff’s counsel. I had a case with Judge Baily-Schiffman, and I echo the MANY sentiments and horror stories repeated by the commentators beneath. We must do our half figuring out how incorrect it’s that she’s allowed to continue disgracing the judicial system. Lets mobilize, rally (perhaps through the time she’s up for reelection) so the citizens of this city will know to not re-elect this unfit unhappy representation of a choose. We because the folks of New York need hold people accountable.
She is unprofessional and unworthy of sitting on the bench. She is the worst decide I’ve ever encountered in civil litigation – due to her lack of civility and common bias in opposition to plaintiffs. In all my years of training regulation I really have never met a worse choose.
She mentioned she had always loved working with students. Baily-Schiffman is the right choose in your case based mostly on their ruling historical past. Loren Baily-Schiffman is an Acting Justice of the Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term within the Second Judicial District of New York. Prior to sitting on the Supreme Court, Justice Baily-Schiffman had been elected to three phrases as a choose of the Civil Court of the City of New York in Kings County starting in 1999. Ballotpedia options 364,104 encyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional employees of editors, writers, and researchers.
The decide confirmed large favor to the protection (in my humble opinion as a outcome of the protection was represented by a gorgeous feminine Lawyer, while the Plaintiff ‘s attorney was not GQ material). What about defending the sincere, hard working, tax paying citizens. We need super giles to ‘drain the swamp’ & remove you out of your place. This is the type of conduct that’s ruining this nation. She is a shame and should not be sitting on the bench. In 20 years of follow I have never been topic to or felt such disrespect and utter lack of regard for even the pretense of unbiased administration of justice.
However, the Court denied the School’s motion to dismiss the purpose for action asserting a violation of NPCL § 715-b. While the Court acknowledged that NPCL § 715-b does not expressly authorize fits for damages by aggrieved workers, the Court held that there’s an implied personal right of motion underneath the statute. Plaintiff alleges SUNY discriminated and retaliated towards her in violation of the NYCHRL. It is nicely established that the City of New York lacks the ability to waive the State of New York’s sovereign immunity by passing an anti-discrimination statute relevant to instrumentalities of the state. Jattan v Queens College of City University of New York , sixty four AD 3d 540, 542 (2d Dept. 2009). SUNY is an instrumentality of the State of New York, Plaintiff did not oppose SUNY’s rivalry that the NYCHRL claims are barred by sovereign immunity.
This web page was final updated through the official’s most recent election or appointment. Michael Starr has served as a court-appointed mediator and early impartial evaluator for federal and state courts in New York City for over 25 years…. Use our proprietary AI software CaseIQ to search out other relevant judgments with just one click on. Get 1 level on offering a legitimate sentiment to this Citation.